Sustainable city development, ecological functions and ecosystem services of natural components in the urban environment
https://doi.org/10.53374/1993-0135-2024-3-56-64
Abstract
One of the characteristic features of the modern era is the rapid pace of urbanization - the historical process of increasing the role of cities in the life of society, associated with industrialization and the active spread of the urban lifestyle. “Quality of life” is a concept that reflects the assessment of factors influencing people’s satisfaction with their living conditions. One of the basic principles of environmental protection is to ensure the priority of the preservation of natural ecological systems, landscapes and natural complexes. The ecosystem functions of forests ensure environmental quality at various levels. The article presents an analysis of the current state of research in the field of ecosystem services of urban plantings and the features of their influence on the microclimate of cities, indicative indicators of the performance of ecosystem functions by green spaces in the cities of Moscow and Krasnoyarsk. The data obtained indicate that the currently available urban green spaces are not enough to maintain an ecological balance between the capabilities of natural components and the needs of the population in cities; therefore, the ecosystem services of adjacent territories are used. A strategy for sustainable urban development should be built on this basis.
About the Authors
E. V. Avdeeva
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
31, Krasnoyarskii rabochii prospekt, Krasnoyarsk, 660037
K. V. Chernikova
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
31, Krasnoyarskii rabochii prospekt, Krasnoyarsk, 660037
A. I. Rudo
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
31, Krasnoyarskii rabochii prospekt, Krasnoyarsk, 660037
Yu. V. Kishkan
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
31, Krasnoyarskii rabochii prospekt, Krasnoyarsk, 660037
References
1. Minin A. A. Ustoychivoye razvitiye Moskvy i ekosistemnyye uslugi yeye prirodnykh territoriy // Byulleten' “Na puti k ustoychivomu razvitiyu Rossii”. Ustoychivoye razvitiye gorodov. 2014. № 69. S. 3–9.
2. Avdeyeva Ye. V. Zelenyye nasazhdeniya gorodov Sibiri : monografiya. Krasnoyarsk : SibGTU, 2000. 150 s.
3. Kuz'min A. V., Yusin G. S. Kachestvo zhizni i kachestvo prostranstvennoy sredy – sotsial'nyye standarty i normativy v gradostroitel'stve, arkhitekture, stroitel'stve // Gradostroitel'stvo. 2011. № 4 (14). S. 16.
4. Ovsyannikova T. Yu., Preobrazhenskaya M. N. Indeksnyy podkhod k otsenke kachestva zhizni naseleniya i urovnya razvitiya urbanizirovannykh territoriy // Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika. 2014. № 1 (25)
5. Avdeeva Ye. V. Rost i indikatornaya rol' drevesnykh rasteniy v urbanizirovannoy srede. Krasnoyarsk : SibGTU, 2007. 361 s.
6. Kasimov D. V. Kasimov V. D., Nekotoryye podkhody k otsenke ekosistemnykh funktsiy (uslug) lesnykh nasazhdeniy v praktike prirodopol'zovaniya : monografiya. M. : Izd. Mir Nauki, 2015. 91 s.
7. Ekonomika sokhraneniya bioraznoobraziya // рod red. A. A. Tishkova. M. : Proyekt GEF “Sokhraneniye bioraznoobraziya Rossiyskoy Federatsii”, Institut ekonomiki prirodopol'zovaniya, 2002. 604 s.
8. Pisarenko A. I., Strakhov V. V. O lesnoy politike Rossii. 2-ye izd. M. : ID “Yurisprudentsiya”, 2012. 600 s.
9. Bukharina I. L., Zhuravleva A. N., Bolyshova O. G. Gorodskiye nasazhdeniya: ekologicheskiy aspekt : monografiya. Izhevsk : Izd-vo “Udmurtskiy universitet”, 2012. 206 s.
10. Kulagin Yu. Z. Drevesnyye rasteniya i promyshlennaya sreda. M. : Nauka, 1974. 124 s.
11. Rozenberg A. G. Stoimost' ekosistemnykh uslug dlya territorii Samarskoy oblasti kak innovatsionnaya sostavlyayushchaya ustoychivogo razvitiya // Aktual'nyye problemy ekonomiki i prava. 2012. № 3. S. 145–150.
12. de Groot R. S., Wilson M. A., Boumans R. M. J. (2002): A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41 (2002), pр. 393–408.
13. McPherson E. G., Nowak D. J., Heisler G., Grimmond S., Souch C., Grant R., Rowntree R. A. (1997): Quantifying urban forest structure, function and value: the Chicago Urban Forest Climate Project. Urban Ecosystems 1, pp. 49–61.
14. Kasimov D. V., Yegorov V. F. Lesnyye nasazhdeniya protiv gololeda // Lokomotiv. 2003. № 12 (564). S. 36–38.
15. Kasimov D. V. Yestestvennoye vozobnovleniye v zashchitnykh lesonasazhdeniyakh zheleznodorozhnogo transporta // Vestnik MGUL, Lesnoy vestnik, 2003. № 3 (28). S. 108–112.
16. Litvinova L. I. Rol' letuchikh fitontsidov rasteniy v ochishchenii atmosfernogo vozdukha ot nekotorykh toksichnykh vybrosov predpriyatiy i avtotransporta // Gigiyena i sanitariya. 1982. № 4. S. 13–16.
17. Kretinin V. M., Selyanina Z. M. Zaderzhaniye pyli list'yami derev'yev i kustarnikov i yeye nakopleniye v svetlo-kashtanovykh pochvakh pod lesnymi polosami // Pochvovedeniye. 2006. № 3. S. 373–377.
Review
For citations:
Avdeeva E.V., Chernikova K.V., Rudo A.I., Kishkan Yu.V. Sustainable city development, ecological functions and ecosystem services of natural components in the urban environment. Conifers of the boreal area. 2024;42(3):56-64. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53374/1993-0135-2024-3-56-64
Views:
25
Email this article 