Preview

Conifers of the boreal area

Advanced search

Efficiency of reafforestation regime of pinus plantations of different densities in southern taiga of Central Siberia

Abstract

Are investigated 35-years experimental plantations of pine (Pinus silvestris Ledeb) at 18 variants of densities in the southern taiga subzone (Krasnoyarsk Krai). The peculiarities of growth dynamics and productivity of dense-variety cenoses, starting from the moment of their planting, were considered. It has been proved that the density of planting cultures initially determines the individual scenario of the course of growth and development of cenoses in the process of formation. Density-dependent characteristics of changes in stocking, diameter and height of cultures are obtained. It is proved that with age, very dense cenoses lose priority in terms of productivity, and the optimal density of cultures gradually shifts to lower planting densities.

About the Author

L. S. Pshenichnikova
Sukachev Institute of Forest SB RAS, Federal Research Center “Krasnoyarsk Science Center SB RAS”
Russian Federation

50/28, Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk, 660036



References

1. Buzykin A. I. O produktivnosti lesov i urovnyakh eye regulirovaniya // Problemy lesovedeniya v Sibiri. Moskva, Nauka, 1977, S. 7–24.

2. Buzykin A. I., Pshenichnikova L. S., Sukhovol’skiy V. G. Gustota i produktivnost’ drevesnykh tsenozov. Novosibirsk, Nauka, 2002, 151 s.

3. Vakurov A. D. Tridtsatiletniy opyt vyrashchiva niya sosnovykh kul’tur raznoy gustoty pod Moskvoy // Lesovedeniye. 1979, Nо. 6, S. 81–85.

4. Varaksin G. S., Koropachinskiy I. Yu. Kul’tury sosny obyknovennoy v Krasnoyarskom kraye. Krasnoyarsk, 2000, 84 s.

5. Georgiyevskiy N. P. Rubki ukhoda za lesom. Moskva, Goslesbumizdat, 1957. 141 s.

6. Isayev A. S., Korovin G. N. Aktual’nyye problemy natsional’noy lesnoy politiki. Moskva, In-t ustoychivogo razvitiya – Tsentr ekologicheskoy politiki Rossii, 2009, 108 s.

7. Kretov E. S. Ekologo-geograficheskiye arealy sosny v kul’ture s optimal’noy nachal’noy gustotoy posadki na Evropeyskoy chasti SSS // Lesnaya geobotanika i biologiya drevesnykh rasteniy. 1975, Vyp. 3, S. 86–97.

8. Martynov A. N. Gustota kul’tur khvoynykh porod i eye znacheniye. Moskva, TSBNTI Gosleskhoza SSSR, 1974, 60 s.

9. Merzlenko M. D., Glazun’ Yu. B. Rost i sostoyaniye kul’tur sosny raznoy gustoty v Serebryanoborskom opytnom lesnichestve // Lesnoy zhurnal. 2014, Nо. 6, S. 32–40.

10. Moiseyev V. S. Taksatsiya molodnyakov. Leningrad, LLTA, 1971. 343 s.

11. Morozov G. F. Ucheniye o lese. Moskva, Leningrad, Gosizdat, 1949, 456 s.

12. Pinchuk A. M. Osobennosti rosta sosny v kul’turakh raznoy gustoty // Lesnoye khozyaystvo. 1961, Nо. 1, S. 63–64.

13. Rukovodstvo po provedeniyu lesovosstanovitel’nykh rabot v lesakh Vostochnoy Sibiri. Moskva, Feder. sluzhba lesn. khoz-va Rossii, 1997, 95 s.

14. Ryabokon’ A. P. Vosproizvodstvo spelykh sosnovykh drevostoyev. Khar’kov, Novoye slovo, 2009, 172 s.

15. Savich Yu. N., Ovsyankin V. N., Poluboyarinov I. O roste, produktivnosti i ustoychivosti sosnovykh kul’tur, sozdannykh pri razlichnoy gustote posadki // Voprosy lesnoy taksatsii. 1978, Vyp. 213, S. 27–38.

16. Sukachev V. N. Izbrannyye trudy. T. 1. Osnovy lesnoy tipologii. Leningrad, Nauka, 1972, 418 s.

17. Timofeyev V. P. Lesnyye kul’tury listvennitsy. Moskva, Lesn. prom-st’, 1977, 216 s.

18. Timofeyev-Resovskiy N. V., Vorontsov N. N., Yablokov A. V. Kratkiy ocherk teorii evolyutsii. Moskva, Nauka, 1969, 408 s.

19. Usol’tsev V. A., Malenko A. A. Lesnyye kul’tury raznoy nachal’noy gustoty. Soobshcheniye 2. Analiz opytnykh posadok sosny obyknovennoy // Eko- Potentsial, 2014, Nо. 3 (7), S. 34–47 .

20. Usol’tsev V. A. Otsenka pokazateley produktivnosti v biogruppakh raznoy gustoty // Lesovedeniye. 1985, Nо. 2, S. 62–72.

21. Nozumi K., Shinozaki K. Studies on the frequency distbution of the weiqht of individual trees a forest stand. II. Exponential distribution // Japan. Y. of Ecologi. 1970, Vol. 20, Nо. 1, P. 1–9.

22. Nozumi K. Studies on the frequency distribution of the weight of individual trees in a forest stand. 3. A beta-tyre distribution // Yapan. Y. of Ecologi. 1971, Vol. 21, Nо. 3-4, P. 152–167.


Review

For citations:


Pshenichnikova L.S. Efficiency of reafforestation regime of pinus plantations of different densities in southern taiga of Central Siberia. Conifers of the boreal area. 2022;40(7):610-615.

Views: 10


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1993-0135 (Print)