The content and balance of spare substances in the common ninebark shoots during introduction to the Nizhny Novgorod region

The physiological state of Oregon grape or holly-leaved barberry (Mahonia aquifolium (Pursh) Nutt.) was studied in terms of the content and balance of spare substances in annual shoots. The relevance of the topic is due to the need for consistent expansion and optimization of the range of woody and shrubby plants used in the creation of urban artificial plantings of various functions and designs. The purpose of the study is to identify the content and ratio of starch and fats in the shoots of holly-leaved barberry during introduction to the Nizhny Novgorod region. The object of the study was the same-aged individuals of seed origin who reached the reproductive phase of ontogenesis. They are placed according to the same schemes in the arboretum collection of Nizhny Novgorod State University, whose geographical coordinates were 56°17'57.984"N, 43°58'59.988"E. Methodologically, the work was based on the principle of a single logical difference and was carried out in 2023–2024 using field stationary and laboratory methods. Starch was tested by color reaction to Lugol's solution, fats were tested by Sudan-III preparation. The phenotypic heterogeneity of the compared plants was established by the presence and balance of spare substances in the tissues of their shoots. Its manifestation was recorded both at the intraorganizational level and in the form of intraspecific individual variability. The content of spare substances in gross terms was estimated statistically: starch – from 7.20 ±1.20 points to 13.60±0.73 points; fats – from 6.20±0.663 points to 13.80±1.020 points; the sum of these substances was from 13.80±1.020 points to 23.80±0.875 points. The analysis of variance confirmed the significance of differences in them between individuals of seed origin: the Fisher criterion (F_op = 3.46...6.02) exceeded the tabular values. The effect of individual differences is great: in starch content – 45.10±13.04%; fat – 58.83± 9.78%; the amount of spare substances – 50.11±11.85%. The information obtained allows us to recognize the expediency of continuing the introduction of measures with magonia.

1. Averkiev D. S. Istorija razvitija rastitel’nogo pokrova Gor’kovskoj oblasti i ee botanikogeograficheskoe delenie // Uchenye zapiski Gor’kovskogo universiteta. Gor’kij, 1954. Vyp. XXXV. Рр. 119–136. (In Russian)

2. Babaev R. N., Besschetnova N. N., Besschetov V. P. Lignifikacija ksilemy raznyh vidov berezy pri introdukcii v uslovijah Nizhegorodskoj oblasti // Izvestija Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehnicheskoj akademii. 2021. Vyp. 235. Рр. 40–56. DOI: 10.21266/2079-4304.2021.235.40-56. (In Russian)

3. Babaev R. N., Besschetnova N. N., Besschetov V. P. Soderzhanie i balans zapasnyh veshhestv v pobegah aborigennoj i introducirovannyh v Nizhegorodskuju oblast’ vidov i form berezy // Trudy SanktPeterburgskogo nauchno-issledovatel’skogo instituta lesnogo hozjajstva. 2022. № 1. Рр. 59–71. DOI 10.21178/2079-6080.2022.1.59. (In Russian)

4. Besschetov V. P., Besschetnova N. N. Selekcionnaja ocenka pljusovyh derev’ev sosny obyknovennoj metodami mnogomernogo analiza // Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Lesnoj zhurnal. № 2/326. 2012. Pp. 58–64. (In Russian)

5. Besschetnov V. P., Besschetnova N. N., Besschetnov P. V. Nasledstvennaja obuslovlennost’ vidospecifichnosti topolej po soderzhaniju krahmala v tkanjah pobegov // Lesnoj vestnik / Forestry bulletin. 2021. T. 25, № 1. Рр. 22–31. DOI: 10.18698/2542-1468-2021-1-22-31. (In Russian)

6. Besschetov V. P., Besschetnova N. N. Lukoyanova N. A., Lokteva A. V. Stimulirujushhij jeffekt primenenija biologicheski aktivnyh preparatov v ukorenenii cherenkov predstavitelej semejstva Barbarisovye (Berberidaceae Juss.) // Landshaftnaja arhitektura i prirodoobustrojstvo: ot proekta do jekonomiki – 2024. Mater. XIII Mezhd. nauch.-prakt. konf.: g. Saratov – Nizhnij Novgorod: 4–5 aprelja 2024 g. Saratov – Nizhnij Novgorod : Vavilovskij universitet, NGATU, 2024. Рр. 263–271. (In Russian)

7. Besschetnov V. P., Besschetnova N. N., Shcherbakov A. Yu. Populjacionnaja struktura geograficheskih kul’tur eli evropejskoj v ocenkah pigmentnogo sostava hvoi // Izvestija Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehnicheskoj akademii. 2021. Vyp. 237. Рр. 113–134. DOI: 10.21266/2079-4304.2021.237.113-134. (In Russian)

8. Besschetnov P. V., Besschetnova N. N. Specifika soderzhanija krahmala v tkanjah pobegov raznyh vidov topolej // Vestnik Nizhegorodskoj gosudarstvennoj sel'skohozjajstvennoj akademii. 2020. № 2(26). Рр. 23–34. (In Russian)

9. Besschetnova N. N. Sravnitel'naja ocenka pljusovyh derev’ev sosny obyknovennoj po soderzhaniju krahmala v pobegah // Vestnik Povolzhskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnologicheskogo universiteta. Serija: Les. Jekologija. Prirodopol’zovanie. 2010. № 2(9). Рр. 49–55. (In Russian)

10. Besschetnova N. N. Soderzhanie zhirov v kletkah pobegov pljusovyh derev’ev sosny obyknovennoj // Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Lesnoj zhurnal. 2012. № 4/328. Рр. 48–55. (In Russian)

11. Besschetnova N. N. Genotipicheskaja neidentichnost’ pljusovyh derev’ev sosny obyknovennoj po soderzhaniju krahmala // Izvestija Orenburgskogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2013. № 4(42). Рр. 20–23. (In Russian)

12. Besschetnova N. N., Besschetnov V. P., Besschetnov P. V. Soderzhanie i balans zapasnyh veshhestv v tkanjah pobegov topolej v Nizhegorodskom Povolzh’e // Izvestija Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehnicheskoj akademii. 2020. Vyp. 232. Рр. 92–104. DOI: 10.21266/2079-4304.2020.232.92-104. (In Russian)

13. Besschetnova N. N., Besschetnov V. P., Kulkova A. V., Mishukova I. V. Soderzhanie krahmala v tkanjah pobegov raznyh vidov eli (Picea A. Dietr.) v uslovijah introdukcii // Izvestija vysshih uchebnyh zavedenij. Lesnoj zhurnal. 2017. № 4. Рр. 57–68. DOI: 10.17238/issn05361036.2017.4.57. (In Russian)

14. Besschetnova N. N., Besschetnov V. P., Mayakova A. A., Vyshegorodtsev A. V. Soderzhanie krahmala v tkanjah godichnyh pobegov magonii padubolistnoj v uslovijah introdukcii // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo gosudarstvennogo agrotehnologicheskogo universiteta. 2024. № 2(42). Рр. 13–23. (In Russian)

15. Besschetnova N. N., Besschetnov V. P., Ornatsky A. N., Kovalenko I. P. Sozdanie lesnyh kul’tur sosny obyknovennoj posevom semjan v Nizhegorodskoj oblasti // Izvestija Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehnicheskoj akademii. 2022. Vyp. 239. Рр. 55–75. DOI: 10.21266/2079-4304.2022.239.55-75. (In Russian)

16. Besschetnova N. N., Besschetnov V. P., Panikarov I. I. Pylezaderzhivajushhaja sposobnost' hvoi eli koljuchej v nasazhdenijah g. Nizhnego Novgoroda // Izvestija Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehnicheskoj akademii. 2024. Vyp. 247. Рр. 188–208. DOI: 10.21266/2079-4304.2024.247.188-208. (In Russian)

17. Besschetnova N. N., Besschetnov V. P., Chernyh V. L. Genotipicheskoe neshodstvo pljusovyh derev’ev sosny obyknovennoj (Pinus sylvestris L.) po fiziologicheskomu sostojaniju // Vestnik Povolzhskogo gosudarstvennogo tehnologicheskogo universiteta. Serija: Les. Jekologija. Prirodopol’zovanie. 2015. № 4(28). Рр. 35–49. (In Russian)

18. Vorob’ev R. A., Besschetnova N. N., Besschetnov V. P., Tjutin A. Ju. Taksacionnye pokazateli pljusovyh derev’ev eli evropejskoj v arhive klonov v Nizhegorodskoj oblasti // Hvojnye boreal’noj zony. 2023. T. XLI, № 1. Рр. 12–23. DOI: 10.53374/1993-0135-2023-1-12-23. (In Russian)

19. Vyshegorodcev A. V., Besschetnova N. N., Besschetnov V. P., Shirokov A. I. Vidospecifichnost’ regenerativnoj sposobnosti cherenkov tisa pri introdukcii v Nizhegorodskuju oblast’ // Hvojnye boreal’noj zony. 2023. T. XLI, № 2. Рр. 118–132. DOI: 10.53374/1993-0135-2023-2-118-132. (In Russian)

20. Esichev A. O., Besschetnova N. N., Besschetnov V. P., Soderzhanie zhirov v tkanjah pobegov listvennicy sibirskoj v uslovijah introdukcii v Nizhegorodskuju oblast’ // Hvojnye boreal’noj zony. 2021. T. XXXIX, № 3. Рр. 180–190. (In Russian)

21. Esichev A. O., Besschetnova N. N., Besschetnov V. P., Babich A. N., Kentbaev E. Zh., Kentbaeva B. A. Soderzhanie i balans zapasnyh veshhestv v pobegah listvennicy sibirskoj v uslovijah reintrodukcii v Nizhegorodskuju oblast’ // Lesnoj vestnik / Forestry Bulletin. 2022. T. 26, № 1. S. 17–27. DOI: 10.18698/2542-1468-2022-1-17-27. (In Russian)

22. Isaev A. S., Korovin G. N., Suhih V. I., Titov S. P., Utkin A. I., Golub A. A., Zamolodchikov D. G., Prjazhnikov A. A. Jekologicheskie problemy pogloshhenija uglekislogo gaza posredstvom lesovosstanovlenija i lesorazvedenija v Rossii. Moskva : Centr jekologicheskoj politiki Rossii, 1995. 156 р. (In Russian)

23. Kramer P. Dzh., Kozlovskij T. T. Fiziologija drevesnyh rastenij: Perevod s anglijskogo. Moskva : Lesnaja promyshlennost’, 1983. 464 р. (In Russian)

24. Kulagin Ju. Z. Drevesnye rastenija i promyshlennaja sreda. Moskva : Nauka, 1974. 125 р. (In Russian)

25. Lakin G. F. Biometrija. Moskva : Vysshaja shkola, 1968. 284 р. (In Russian)

26. Libbert Je. Fiziologija rastenij: Perevod s nemeckogo. Moskva : Mir, 1976. 582 р.

27. Lir H., Pol’ster G., Fidler G.-I. Fiziologija drevesnyh rastenij: Perevod s nemeckogo. Moskva : Lesnaja promyshlennost’, 1974. 424 р. (In Russian)

28. Ljahovenko O. I., Chulkov D. I. Osnovnye jekologicheskie problemy rossijskih gorodov i strategija ih razreshenija // Russkaja politologija – Russian political science. 2017. № 3 (4). Рр. 21–26. (In Russian)

29. Maksimov G. L. Metody biohimicheskogo analiza rastenij. Leningrad: Izdatel'stvo Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 1978. 192 р. (In Russian)

30. Mamaev S. A. O problemah i metodah vnutrividovoj sistematiki drevesnyh rastenij. II. Amplituda izmenchivosti. Zakonomernosti formoobrazovanija i differenciacii vida u drevesnyh rastenij // Trudy Instituta jekologii rastenij i zhivotnyh. Vypusk 64. Sverdlovsk : Redakcionno-izdatel'skij sovet Ural’skogo filiala akademii nauk SSSR, 1969. Рр. 3–38. (In Russian)

31. Panikarov I. I., Besschetnova N. N., Besschetnov V. P. Vzaimozavisimost’ parametrov hvoi eli koljuchej v opredelenii ee pylezaderzhivajushhej sposobnosti // Hvojnye boreal’noj zony. 2023. T. XLI, № 6. Рр. 495– 503. DOI: 10.53374/1993-0135-2023-6-495-503. (In Russian)

32. Panikarov I. I., Besschetnova N. N., Vorob’ev R. A. Izmenchivost’ parametrov hvoi eli koljuchej v ob”ektah ozelenenija Nizhnego Novgoroda // Nauchnoe tvorchestvo molodezhi — lesnomu kompleksu Rossii. Materialy XX Vserossijskoj (nacional’noj) nauchnotehnicheskoj konferencii studentov i aspirantov. Ekaterinburg : Ural’skij gosudarstvennyj lesotehnicheskij universitet, 2024. Рр. 303–308. (In Russian)

33. Prozina N. M. Botanicheskaja mikrotehnika. Moskva : Vysshaja shkola, 1960. 205 р.

34. Ulitin M. M., Besschetnov V. P. Jeffektivnost’ sozdanija lesnyh kul’tur listvennicy Sukacheva v Nizhegorodskoj oblasti // Izvestija Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehnicheskoj akademii. 2021. Vyp. 237. Рр. 135–154. DOI: 10.21266/2079-4304.2021.237.135-154. (In Russian)

35. Usol’cev V. A., Pljuha N. I., Cepordej I. S. Otnoshenie diametra krony k diametru stvola: vseobshhie modeli lesoobrazujushhih vidov Evrazii // Hvojnye boreal'noj zony. 2024. T. XLII, № 1. Рр. 36–42. DOI: 10.53374/1993-0135-2024-1-36-42. (In Russian)

36. Besschetnova N. N., Besschetnov V. P., Babich N. A., Bryntcev V. A. Differentiation of the plus trees of Scots pine on the physiological status of xylem // Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal]. 2023. № 4. Рр. 9–25. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2023-4-9-25.

37. Chen X.-H., Xiang K.-L., Lian L., Peng H.-W., Erst A. S., Xiang X.-G., Chen Z.-D., Wang W. Biogeographic diversification of Mahonia (Berberidaceae): Implications for the origin and evolution of East Asian subtropical evergreen broadleaved forests // Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution. 2020. Vol. 151. Article number 106910. Total pages 11. Pp. 1–11. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2020.106910.

38. Dawkins H. C. Crown diameters: their relation to bole diameter in tropical forest trees // The Commonwealth Forestry Review. 1963. Vol. 42, No. 4(114). Pp. 318–333. URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42603453.

39. Doweld A. B. New names of fossil Berberidaceae // Phytotaxa. 2018. Vol. 351, No. 1. Pp. 72–80. DOI: 10.11646/hytotaxa.351.1.6.

40. Güner T. H., Denk T. The genus Mahonia in the Miocene of Turkey: Taxonomy and biogeographic implications // Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. 1 May 2012, Vol. 175. Pp. 32–46. DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2012.02.005.

41. Hu Q., Huang J., Chen Y.-F., Manchester S. R. Mahonia fossils from the Oligocene of South China: Taxonomic and biogeographic implications // Palaeoworld. 2017. Vol. 26, Is. 4. Pp. 691–698. DOI: 10.1016/j.palwor.2017.03.004.

42. Kramer P. J. The role of physiology in forestry // The Forestry Chronicle. 1956. Vol. 32, Is. 3. Pp. 297–308. DOI: 10.5558/tfc32297-3.

43. Loconte H., Estes J. Phylogenetic systematics of Berberidaceae and Ranunculales (Magnoliidae) // Systematic Botany. 1989. Vol. 14, Is. 4. Pp. 565–579. DOI: 10.2307/2419001.

44. Meacham C. A. Phylogeny of the Berberidaceae with an evaluation of classifications // Systematic Botany. 1980. Vol. 5, No. 2. Рр. 149–172. DOI: 10.2307/2418623.

45. Nickol M. G. Phylogeny and inflorescences of Berberidaceae – a morphological survey // Systematics and Evolution of the Ranunculiflorae. Plant Systematics and Evolution. Supplement 9. Vol. 9 / Jensen U., Kadereit J. W. eds. Vienna: Springer-Verlag Wien, 1995. Pp. 327–340. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7091-6612-3_35.

46. Wang B., Bu Y., Tao G. Yan C., Zhou X., Li W., Zhao P., Yang Y., Gou R. Quantifying the effect of crown vertical position on individual tree competition: total overlap index and its application in sustainable forest management // Sustainability. 2020. Vol. 12. Article number 7498, Total pages 18. Pp. 1–18. DOI: 10.3390/su12187498.

47. Wang L.-J., Gao M.-D., Sheng M.-Y., Yin J. Cluster analysis of karyotype similarity coefficients in Epimedium (Berberidaceae): insights in the systematics and evolution // PhytoKeys. 2020. No. 161. Pp. 11–26. DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.161.51046.

48. Wang W., Chen Z.-D., Liu Y., Li R.-Q., Li J.-H. Phylogenetic and Biogeographic Diversification of Berberidaceae in the Northern Hemisphere // Systematic Botany. 2007. Vol. 32, Is. 4. Pp. 731–742. DOI: 10.1043/06-16.1.