Preview

Conifers of the boreal area

Advanced search

Assessment of the prospects of decorative forms and varieties of mountain pine (Pinus mugo) for greening of Siberian cities

https://doi.org/10.53374/1993-0135-2024-6-14-22

Abstract

The article concludes the issues of expanding the range of woody plants for greening the territory of Siberia and the sustainable formation of the urban environment using the example of the city of Bratsk. As a result, studies were carried out on the prospects of various forms and varieties of mountain pine for use in green construction and expanding the floristic diversity of cities and towns in Siberia. More than 200 specimens of mountain pine of different ages, in different growing conditions, belonging to 17 varieties and small forms of the species were examined. The research into the prospects of mountain pines was carried out from 2015 to 2023 in different areas of urban development, in green areas of various types and purposes. A large number of private collections of dendrointroducers were also examined in country houses, garden plots, and cottage plots. Private gardens in the absence of special scientific institutions offer ample opportunities for introduction studies of many foreign species. During many years of research, the degree of ripening of shoots of forms and varieties of mountain pine, winter hardiness, resistance to sunburn in early spring, ability to reproduce were determined, morphometric data of the studied specimens was collected and systematized, quantitative indicators of annual growth of shoots, which characterize the condition and prospects for the use  of these varieties and forms for landscaping the cities of Siberia were studied. The article provides data on the use of mountain pine in different growing conditions and use in various types of plantings. During the study, a classification  of life forms of mountain pines was developed, which subdivides all studied forms and varieties into full-sized, mediumsized, dwarf and miniature shrubs. This classification most accurately reflects the variational range of biomorphological characteristics of modern mountain pine varieties. Based on the analysis of the indicators of the integral assessment of the success of introduction, each form and variety was assigned a certain class of prospects, characterizing their use in green building. The forms and cultivars that received a high class of prospects as a result of the study are recommended for use in various forms of urban landscaping and private gardening in summer cottages and household plots.

About the Authors

E. M. Runova
Bratsk State University
Russian Federation

40, Makarenko str., Bratsk, 665709, Irkutsk region



P. S. Gnatkovich
Filial of Baikal State University
Russian Federation

20v, Lenina str., Ust-Ilimsk, 666673, Irkutsk region



References

1. Gnatkovich P. S., Runova E. M. Perspektivnye vidy i formy hvojnyh ekzotov dlya ozeleneniya naselennyh punktov severnyh territorij Irkutskoj oblasti // Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. 2021. № 6. S. 13–21. DOI: 10.17513/use.37635.

2. Zalyvskaya O. S. Kompleksnaya ocenka adaptivnoj sposobnosti introducentov // Izv. vuzov. Lesn. zhurn. 2014. № 6. S. 161–166.

3. Krekova Ya. A., Zalesov S. V., Chebat’ko N. K. Rezul’taty introdukcii sosen (Pinus L.) pri ispytanii v kollekcionnyh nasazhdeniyah arboretuma i dendroparka KazNILHA // Vestnik gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. Shakarima g. Semej. 2018. № 3 (83). S. 275–279.

4. Runova E. M., Gnatkovich P. S. Perspektivy vnedreniya introdu-centov chastnyh sadov v assortiment zelenyh nasazhdenij goroda Bratska // Lesotekhnicheskij zhurnal. 2014. Tom 4, № 2(14). S. 68–78. DOI: 10.12737/4509.

5. Zalesov S. V., Platonov E. P., Gusev A. V. Perspektivnost’ dre-vesnyh introducentov dlya ozeleneniya v usloviyah srednej podzony tajgi Zapadnoj Sibiri // Agrarnyj vestnik Urala. 2011. № 4 (83). S. 56–58.

6. Gordeeva G. N., Lobanov A. I. Prodolzhitel’nost’ zhiznennogo cikla i zimostojkost’ drevesnyh introducentov v suhostepnoj zone Hakasii // Izv. vuzov. Lesn. zhurn. 2022. № 3. S. 73–90. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2022-373-90.

7. Kulikova O. N., Haritonova O. N. Sostoyanie hvojnyh rastenij dendrologicheskogo sada im. S. F. Kharitonovа // Vestnik IrGSHA. 2011. T. 2, № 44. S. 89–95.

8. Gusev A. V., Zalesov S. V., Sarsekova D. N. Metodika opredeleniya perspektivnosti introdukcii drevesnyh rastenij // Social’no-ekonomicheskie i ekologicheskie problemy lesnogo kompleksa v ramkah koncepcii 2020 : materialy VII Mezhdunar. nauch.-tekhn. konf. Ekaterinburg : Ural. gos. lesotekhn. un-t, 2009. S. 272–275.

9. Lapin P. I., Sidneva S. V. Ocenka perspektivnosti introdukcii drevesnyh rastenij po dannym vizual’nyh nablyudenij // Opyt introdukcii drevesnyh rastenij. M. : Izd. GBSAISSSR, 1973. S. 7–67.

10. Isaeva L. G., Ershov V. V., Urbanavichyus G. P., Borovichev E. A. Introdukciya kedra i listvennicy v usloviyah Kol’skogo Zapolyar’ya // Izv. vuzov. Lesn. zhurn. 2023. № 4. S. 41–57. DOI: 10.37482/0536-10362023-4-41-57.

11. Lyashcheva L. V., Lyashchev A. A., Shtejnberg Yu. S. Zimostojkost’ hvojnyh rastenij v usloviyah severnoj lesostepi yuga Tyumenskoj oblasti // Izv. vuzov. Lesn. zhurn. 2022. № 1. S. 49–61. DOI: 10.37482/0536-10362022-1-49-61.

12. Druzhinin N. A., Druzhinin F. N., Koryakina D. M., Cypilev S. V., Chuhina O. V. Rezul’taty i ocenka mnogoletnej introdukcii na osobo ohranyaemyh prirodnyh territoriyah yuzhno-taezhnogo rajona // Izv. vuzov. Lesn. zhurn. 2020. № 6. S. 74–87. DOI: 10.37482/0536-10362020-6-74-87.

13. Andronova M. M., Babich N. A., Hamitov R. S. Stupenchataya introdukciya drevesnyh rastenij na severe Russkoj ravniny. Arhangel’sk : SAFU, 2021. 412 s. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2021-3-73-85.

14. Belanova A. P., Otmahov Yu. S., Chernikova T. S., Chindyaeva L. N. Vnedrenie chuzherodnyh vidov drevesnyh rastenij v gorodskie lesa Novosibirska // Sibirskij lesnoj zhurnal. 2019. № 6. S. 72–81. DOI: 10.15372/SJFS20190608.

15. Babich N. A., Karbasnikova E. B. Naturalizaciya vidov dendroflory v usloviyah introdukcionnogo stressa. Arhangel’sk : SAFU, 2022. 236 s.

16. Kartashova N. P., Selivanova A. S., Molodyh M. S. Landshaftnye priemy sozdaniya gorodskoj sistemy ozeleneniya // Lesotekhnicheskij zhurnal, 2018. T. 8, № 2 (30). S. 122–131. DOI: 10.12737/article_5b24060f 315680.70076881.

17. Tarhanov S. N., Pinaevskaya E. A., Aganina Yu. E. Osobennosti adaptacii raznyh form sosny obyknovennoj v usloviyah dlitel’nogo izbytochnogo uvlazhneniya pochv // IVUZ Lesnoj zhurnal, 2021. № 2(380). S. 30–44. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2021-2-30-44.

18. Kartashova N. P., Kruglyak V. V. Landshaftnaya organizaciya territorij ob”ektov kul’turno-bytovogo naznacheniya // Lesnoj vestnik / Forestry Bulletin, 2022. T. 26, № 5. S. 71–82. DOI: 10.18698/2542-1468-2022-571-82.

19. Ispol’zovanie hvojnyh rastenij v tipovyh landshaftnyh proektah / T. Yu. Aksyanova, O. M. Stupakova, E. A. Usova, M. V. Filina, A. A. Goroshko // Hvojnye boreal’noj zony. T. XXXIX, № 4. Krasnoyarsk : SibGU im. M. F. Reshetneva, 2021. S. 245–252.

20. Stupakova O. M., Aksyanova T. Yu. Vidovoe raznoobrazie, kompoziciya i sostoyanie iskusstvennyh hvojnyh nasazhdenij skverov goroda Krasnoyarska // Hvojnye boreal’noj zony. 2023. Tom XLI, № 2. S. 158– 161. DOI: 10.53374/1993-0135-2023-1-158-161.

21. Ioffe A. A. Dendrarij Instituta lesa im. V. N. Sukacheva SO RAN kak element sozdaniya novogo obshchestvennogo prostranstva g. Krasnoyarska // Sibirskij lesnoj zhurnal. 2023. № 5. S. 7–9. DOI: 10.15372/SJFS20230502.

22. Pashenova N. V., Percovaya A. A., Baranchikov Yu. N. Problema inducirovannogo immuniteta hvojnyh // Sibirskij lesnoj zhurnal. 2023. № 5. S. 10–13. DOI: 10.15372/SJFS20230503.

23. Stupenchataya introdukciya vidov dendroflory v severo-vostochnuyu chast’ Russkoj ravniny (obzor) / N. A. Babich, E. B. Karbasnikova, M. M. Andronova, O. S. Zalyvskaya, Yu. V. Aleksandrova, N. P. Gaevskij // Izv. vuzov. Lesn. zhurn. 2021. № 3. S. 73–85. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2021-3-73-85.

24. Butorova O. F., Matveeva R. N. Opyt introdukcii drevesnyh rastenij evropejskoj flory v zelenoj zone g. Krasnoyarska // International Scientific Journal. 2015. № 9. S. 38–42.

25. Pashina M. N., Ievskaya A. A., Imeskenova E .G. Ocenka sostoyaniya drevesno-kustarnikovoj rastitel’nosti goroda Ulan-Ude // Vestnik Buryatskoj gosudarstvennoj sel’skohozyajstvennoj akademii imeni V. R. Filippova. 2021. № 4(65). S. 146–156. DOI: 10.34655/bgsha.2021.65.4.020.

26. Bezrukih V. A., Avdeeva E. V., Selenina E. A. Obosnovanie vidovogo sostava drevesnyh rastenij s uchetom dendroklimaticheskogo rajonirovaniya territorii sibirskogo goroda i ego prigorodnoj zony (na primere goroda Krasnoyarska) // Hvojnye boreal’noj zony. 2020. T. XXXVIII, № 5-6. S. 225–236.


Review

For citations:


Runova E.M., Gnatkovich P.S. Assessment of the prospects of decorative forms and varieties of mountain pine (Pinus mugo) for greening of Siberian cities. Conifers of the boreal area. 2024;42(6):14–22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53374/1993-0135-2024-6-14-22

Views: 14


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 1993-0135 (Print)