Models for estimating biomass of forest-forming species by crown diameter as related to drone involving
https://doi.org/10.53374/1993-0135-2023-4-300-305
Abstract
Due to climate change and the potential possibility of its stabilization with the help of managed forests and assessment of their carbon depositing capacity, the possibility of operational assessment of biomass and organic carbon of forest cover becomes particularly relevant. In recent years, remote sensing technologies of forests based on unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) have made it possible to obtain the values of the parameters of tree crowns from as close distance as possible. That provides not only high accuracy and speed of measurements, but also the ability to distinguish trees by species composition. In this study, an attempt is made to develop allometric models designed to estimate the biomass of trees of forest-forming genera in Russia by crown diameter. To achieve the research goal, an author's database of 15200 definitions of tree biomass was used. A number of 1665 model trees of five coniferous and 780 model trees of six deciduous species were selected from it. Since the actual values of the biomass of trees are presented in the database by several vicarious species within the genus, the analysis of the dependence of the biomass of a tree on its crown diameter is performed at the level of genera and subgenera. A package of allometric models of the biomass of trees of full component composition for each genera and subgenera is calculated, all regression coefficients of which are significant at the level of p < 0,001. The proposed allometric models can be used to estimate the biomass and organic carbon of trees and stands of forest-forming genera in Russia based on digital photogrammetry of visual data obtained using drones.
About the Authors
V. A. UsoltsevRussian Federation
37, Siberian tract, Yekaterinburg, 620100
202a, 8 Marta Str., Yekaterinburg, 620144,
I. S. Tsepordey
Russian Federation
202a, 8 Marta Str., Yekaterinburg, 620144,
V. P. Chasovskikh
Russian Federation
62, 8 March Str., Yekaterinburg, 620144
References
1. Leont'yev V.L. Ob opredelenii zapasa saksaul'nikov // Botanicheskiy zhurnal. 1950. T. 35, № 6. S. 637–645.
2. Sinitsyn S.G., Sukhikh V.I. Ispol'zovaniye materialov mnogozonal'nykh i kosmicheskikh s"yemok v interesakh lesnogo khozyaystva // Aerokosmicheskiye issledovaniya Zemli.M.:Nauka, 1979.S. 86–101.
3. Usol'tsev V.A. Perspektivy 3D-modelirovaniya prostranstvennoy struktury fitomassy lesov // Ekopotentsial. 2014. № 2 (6). S. 55–71. https://elar.usfeu.ru/bitstream/123456789/3356/1/.
4. Usol'tsev V.A., Tsepordey I.S. Otnosheniye podzemnoy biomassy k nadzemnoy lesoobrazuyushchikh vidov Yevrazii v gradiyentakh temperatur i osadkov // Biosfera. 2022. T. 14, № 3. S. 158–179ю
5. Balenovic I., Seletkovic A., Pernar R. et al. Regression models of DBH estimation for photogrammetric measurement // Šumarski list. 2012. No. 3–4. P. 129–139 (словен.с англ.резюме).
6. Baskerville G. L. Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass // Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 1972. Vol. 2(1). P. 49–53.
7. Francis J.K. The relationship of bole diameters and crown widths of seven bottomland hardwood species. USDA Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station. Research Note SO-328, 1986. 3 p.
8. Guttinger S. The limits of replicability // European Journal for Philosophy of Science. 2020. Vol. 10. P. 1–17.
9. Ilvessalo Y. On the correlation between the crown diameter and the stem of trees // Communicationes Instituti Forestalis Fenniae. 1950. Vol. 38(2). P. 1–32.
10. Lockhart B. R., Weih R. Jr., Smith K. M. Crown radius and diameter at breast height relationships for six bottomland hardwood species // Journal of the Arkansas Academy of Science. 2005. Vol. 59. P. 110–115.
11. Matthews G. The carbon content of trees. Technical Paper 4. Edinburgh: Forestry Commission, 1993. 21р.
12. Minor C. O. Stem-crown diameter relationships in southern pine // Journal of Forestry. 1951. Vol. 49 (7). P. 490–493.
13. Olsson H., Egberth M., Engberg J. et al. Current and emerging operational uses of remote sensing in Swedish forestry // McRoberts R.E., Reams G.A., Van Deusen P.C., McWilliams W.H. (eds.). Proceedings of the XVII-th annual forest inventory and analysis symposium; October 3–6, 2005; Portland, ME. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-77. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, 2007. P. 39–46.
14. Pernar R. Application of results of aerial photograph interpretation and geographical information system for planning in forestry // Glasnik za šumske pokuse: Annales Experimentis Silvarum Culturae Provehendis. 1997. Vol. 34. P. 141–189.
15. Ter-Mikaelian M. T, Korzukhin M. D. Biomass equations for sixty-five North American tree species. Forest Ecology and Management. 1997. Vol. 97. P. 1–24.
16. Usoltsev V. A. Single-tree biomass data for remote sensing and ground measuring of Eurasian forests: digital version. The second edition, enlarged. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Forest Engineering University; Botanical Garden of Ural Branch of RAS, 2020. https:// elar.usfeu.ru/handle/123456789/9647.
17. van Geffen F., Heim B., Brieger F. et al. SiDro-Forest: a comprehensive forest inventory of Siberian boreal forest investigations including drone-based point clouds, individually labeled trees, synthetically generated tree crowns, and Sentinel-2 labeled image patches // Earth System Science Data. 2022. Vol. 14. P. 4967–4994. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4967-2022.
18. Weaver T. Area-mass relationships for common Montana shrubs // Proceedings of the Montana Academy of Sciences. 1977. Vol. 37. P. 54–58.
Review
For citations:
Usoltsev V.A., Tsepordey I.S., Chasovskikh V.P. Models for estimating biomass of forest-forming species by crown diameter as related to drone involving. Conifers of the boreal area. 2024;42(7):43–47. https://doi.org/10.53374/1993-0135-2023-4-300-305