Models of Picea spp. biomass conversion and expansion factors in geographical gradients of Eurasia
https://doi.org/10.53374/1993-0135-2025-1-7-12
Abstract
Forest biomass data provide an important contribution to the implementation of sustainable forest management, maintaining a positive carbon balance in the earth's atmosphere, as well as the supply of materials and renewable energy. When modeling data on forest biomass, the Biomass Conversion and Expansion Factor (BCEF) has become widespread as the ratio of dry biomass of its some fraction to the volume stock. The relevance of the BCEF application is determined, on the one hand, by the complexity of obtaining actual data on the stand biomass on sample plots, and, on the other hand, by the presence of huge arrays of data on volume stocks accumulated by traditional forest mensuration. The BCEF provides the interface of traditional tables and banks of forest inventory information on volume stocks with data on the stand biomass. There is no consensus on the patterns of changes in the BCEF in the geographical gradients of Eurasia. The purpose of our research was to develop models of BCEF of biomass of spruce stands (genus Picea L.) in geographical gradients of Eurasia using the author's database of 942 sample plots. As a result, models of BCEF of aboveground and underground biomass of spruce stands are proposed, designed to assess the stand biomass by the values of stand age and volume stock. Unlike previously published models, the proposed models are species-specific and differentiated by geographical coordinates of latitude and longitude. It was found that the BCEF of the aboveground and underground biomass fractions increases in the directions from south to north and from west to east. The age of the stands and their geographical location provide approximately equal contributions to the explanation of the variability of the BCEF of biomass. At the same time, the contribution of latitude is about three times greater than the contribution of longitude. The proposed BCEF models can be used to calculate the carbon pool in spruce stands according to forest inventory data.
About the Author
V. A. UsoltsevRussian Federation
37, Siberian tract, Yekaterinburg, 620100
References
1. Alekseyev V. A., Berdsi R. A. Uglerod v ekosistemakh lesov i bolot Rossii. Krasnoyarsk: In-t lesa SO RAN, 1994. 224 s.
2. Zamolodchikov D. G., Utkin A. I., Korovin G. N. Opredeleniye zapasov ugleroda po zavisimym ot vozrasta nasazhdeniy konversionno-ob"yemnym koeffitsiyentam // Lesovedeniye. 1998. № 3. S. 84–93.
3. Zamolodchikov D. G., Utkin A. I., Chestnykh O. V. Koeffitsiyenty konversii zapasov nasazhdeniy v fitomassu dlya osnovnykh lesoobrazuyushchikh porod Rossii // Lesnaya taksatsiya i lesoustroystvo. 2003. № 1. S. 119–127.
4. Zamolodchikov D. G., Utkin A. I., Korovin G. N. Konversionnꞏyye koeffitsiyenty fitomassa/zapas v svyazi s dendrometricheskimi pokazatelyami i sostavom drevostoyev // Lesovedeniye. 2005. № 6. S. 73–81.
5. Isayev A. S., Korovin G. N., Utkin A. I. i dr. Otsenka zapasov i godichnogo deponirovaniya ugleroda v fitomasse lesnykh ekosistem Rossii // Lesovedeniye. 1993. № 5. S. 3–10.
6. Liyepa I. Ya. Dinamika drevesnykh zapasov: Prognozirovaniye i ekologiya. Riga: Zinatne, 1980. 170 s.
7. Makarevskiy M. F. Zapasy i balans organicheskogo ugleroda v lesnykh i bolotnykh biogeotsenozakh Karelii // Ekologiya. 1991. № 3. S. 3–10.
8. Onuchin A. A., Borisov A. N. Opyt taksatsii fitomassy sosnovykh drevostoyev // Lesovedeniye. 1984. № 6. S. 66–71.
9. Pozdnyakov L. K., Protopopov V. V., Gorbatenko V. M. Biologicheskaya produktivnost' lesov Sredney Sibiri i Yakutii. Krasnoyarsk: Knizhnoye izd-vo, 1969. 120 s.
10. Rozenberg G. S., Dolotovskiy I. M. Yeshche raz o pokazatelyakh sily vliyaniya // Biologicheskiye nauki. 1988. № 9. S. 105–110.
11. Usol'tsev V. A. Rost i struktura fitomassy drevostoyev. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1988. 253 s. http://elar.usfeu.ru/handle/123456789/3352.
12. Usol'tsev V. A. Formirovaniye bankov dannykh o fitomasse lesov. Yekaterinburg: URO RAN, 1998. 541 s. http://elar.usfeu.ru/handle/123456789/3224.
13. Usol'tsev V. A. Fitomassa lesov Severnoy Yevrazii: normativy i elementy geografii. Yekaterinburg: URO RAN, 2002. 762 s. http://elar.usfeu.ru/handle/123456789/3302.
14. Usol'tsev V. A. Deponirovaniye ugleroda lesami Ural'skogo regiona Rossii (po sostoyaniyu Gosudarstvennogo ucheta lesnogo fonda na 2007 god). Yekaterinburg : Ural'skiy gosudarstvennyy lesotekhnicheskiy universitet, 2018. 265 s. http://elar.usfeu.ru/handle/123456789/7768.
15. Usol'tsev V. A. Biomassa i pervichnaya produktsiya lesov Yevrazii. Elektronnaya baza dannykh. 4-e dop. izd. Monografiya. Yekaterinburg: Botanicheskiy sad URO RAN, Ural'skiy gosudarstvennyy lesotekhnicheskiy universitet, 2023. -1 elektron. opt. disk (CD-ROM). https://elar.usfeu.ru/handle/123456789/12452.
16. Usol'tsev V. A., Tsepordey I. S., Karaban A. A. i dr. Ispol'zovaniye regressionnoy modeli pri analize konversionno-ob"yemnykh koeffitsiyentov fitomassy ol'khi v geograficheskikh gradiyentakh Yevrazii // Lesnoy vestnik. 2023. T. 27. (V pechati).
17. Utkin A. I., Zamolodchikov D. G., Sukhikh V. I. Vliyaniye vozrastnogo kriteriya lesnykh nasazhdeniy na tochnost' regional'nykh otsenok zapasov i deponirovaniya ugleroda v fitomasse lesov // Ekologiya. 1999. № 4. S. 243–250.
18. Baskerville G. L. Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass // Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 1972. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 49–53.
19. Dong L., Zhang L., Li F. Evaluation of stand biomass estimation methods for major forest types in the eastern Da Xing’an Mountains, Northeast China // Forests. 2019. Vol. 10. Article 715. DOI:10.3390/f10090715.
20. Flury Ph. Untersuchungen űber das Verhältniss der Reisigmasse zur Derbholzmasse // Mitteilungen der Schweizerische Centralanstalt für das forstliche Versuchswesen. 1892. Vol. 2. P. 25–32.
21. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IGES : Hayama, Japan, 2006. 20 p.
22. Lakida P., Nilsson S., Shvidenko A. Estimation of forest phytomass for selected countries of the former European USSR // Working Paper WP-95-79. IIASA: Laxenburg, Austria, 1995. 33 p.
23. Müller A., Weigelt J., Götz A. et al. The role of biomass in the sustainable development goals: A reality check and governance implications. IAS Working Paper; IASS: Potsdam, Germany, 2015. 36 p.
24. Schepaschenko D., Moltchanova E., Shvidenko A. et al. Improved estimates of biomass expansion factors for Russian forests // Forests. 2018. Vol. 9. Article 312.
25. Usoltsev V. A., Hoffmann C. W. Combining harvest sample data with inventory data to estimate forest biomass // Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research. 1997. Vol. 12. No. 3. P. 273–279.
26. Wang Y., Miao Z., Hao Y. et al. Effects of biotic and abiotic factors on biomass conversion and expansion factors of natural white birch forest (Betula platyphylla Suk.) in Northeast China // Forests. 2023. Vol. 14. Article 362. DOI:10.3390/f14020362.
Review
For citations:
Usoltsev V.A. Models of Picea spp. biomass conversion and expansion factors in geographical gradients of Eurasia. Conifers of the boreal area. 2025;43(1):7–12. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53374/1993-0135-2025-1-7-12