Variability of 17-year-old model trees indicators of siberian cedar pine
https://doi.org/10.53374/1993-0135-2023-2-145-150
Abstract
The variability of the indicators of model trees of the 17-year-old Siberian cedar pine in the conditions of the Educational and Experimental Forestry of the Reshetnev University (suburban zone of Krasnoyarsk) is given. The purpose of the research is to establish the features of growth, the formation of side branches, the magnitude of annual shoot growths in height from model trees before and after planting on the plantation. Then the purpose is to study the length and mass of needles, the number of side roots of the first and second orders in second-generation trees on the plantation "Power transmission line – 2". The size and weight of the needles were determined on the central and side shoots. It was established that the greater height, the current growth of the shoot, the length of the needles, the number of lateral roots differed in tree No. 5-6. The formation of lateral branches in the whorls in different years varied from 1 to 6 pieces. Before transplanting seedlings to the plantation in 2014, the growth of the central shoot averaged 33.5 cm. In the next three years after transplantation, the growth decreased to 1.3–10.0 cm. At the age of 17, there was a sharp increase in the current growth of the shoot to 25.5–42.0 cm. The length and mass of the needles on the central shoot exceeded these indicators on the lateral ones. A correlation close relationship was established between the height and number of roots, the mass of needles and its length.
About the Authors
R. N. Matveeva
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
31, Krasnoyarskii rabochii prospekt, Krasnoyarsk, 660037
O. F. Butorova
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
31, Krasnoyarskii rabochii prospekt, Krasnoyarsk, 660037
Yu. E. Shcherba
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
31, Krasnoyarskii rabochii prospekt, Krasnoyarsk, 660037
S. N. Dyrdin
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
31, Krasnoyarskii rabochii prospekt, Krasnoyarsk, 660037
I. V. Komarov
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
31, Krasnoyarskii rabochii prospekt, Krasnoyarsk, 660037
A. S. Korostelev
Reshetnev Siberian State University of Science and Technology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
31, Krasnoyarskii rabochii prospekt, Krasnoyarsk, 660037
References
1. Andronova M. M., Korchagov S. A. Rost i razvitie sosny kedrovoj sibirskoj v Vologodskoj oblasti // Vestnik MGUL. Lesnoj vestnik. 2015. T.19, № 6. S. 45–49.
2. Babinceva R. M., Polikarpov N. P., Chebakova N. M. Prirodozashchitnaya rol' kedrovyh lesov // Kedrovye lesa Sibiri. Novosibirsk : Nauka, 1985. S. 40–49.
3. Babich N. A., Sokolov N. N., Bahtin A. A. Bescennyj dar tajgi. Arhangel'sk: AGTU, 1996. 224 s.
4. Bekh I. A., Danchenko A. M., Kibish I. V. Sosna kedrovaya sibirskaya (sibirskoe chudo-derevo). Tomsk : TGU, 2004.160 s.
5. Bratilova N. P., Kalinin A. V. Ocenka bioproduktivnosti plantacionnyh kul'tur kedrovyh sosen v zelenoj zone Krasnoyarska. Krasnoyarsk : SibGTU, 2012. 132 s.
6. Bratilova N. P., Kalagin V. N., Grishlova M. V., Konovalova D. A., Lapshova M. S. Endogennaya izmenchivost' pokazatelej sosny kedrovoj korejskoj na plantacii // Hvojnye boreal'noj zony. 2020. T XXXVIII, № 1-2. S. 7–11.
7. Bryncev V. A., Kozhenkova A. A. Geograficheskaya izmenchivost' sosny kedrovoj sibirskoj (Rinus sibirica Du Tour) pri introdukcii // Lesnoj zhurnal. 2016. № 6. S. 89–97.
8. Goroshkevich S. N. Dinamika rosta i plodonosheniya kedra sibirskogo (Rinus sibirica Du Tour) : ciklicheskie ili aciklicheskie kolebaniya // Vestnik TGU. Biologiya. Tomsk : TGU, 2017. № 38. S. 10–120.
9. Danchenko A. M., Bekh I. A. Kedrovye lesa Zapadnoj Sibiri. Tomsk : TGU, 2010. 424 s.
10. Debkov N. M., Poklyackij D. A., Parshina V.-V. G. Ocenka sostoyaniya potencial'nyh kedrovnikov srednej tajgi Zapadnoj Sibiri // Izvestiya Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotekhnicheskoj akademii. 2017. Vyp. 221. S. 52–64. DOI: 10.21266/2079-4304.2017.221.52-64.
11. Dospekhov B. A. Metodika polevogo opyta. Moskva : Kolos, 1973. 336 s.
12. Ignatenko M. M. Sibirskij kedr. Moskva : Nauka, 1988. 161 s.
13. Iroshnikov A. I. Polimorfizm populyacij kedra sibirskogo // Izmenchivost' drevesnyh rastenij Sibiri. Krasnoyarsk, 1974. S. 77–103.
14. Krylov G. V., Talancev N. K., Kazakova N. F. Kedr. Moskva : Lesnaya promyshlennost', 1983. 216 s.
15. Mamaev S. A. Formy vnutrividovoj izmenchivosti drevesnyh rastenij. Moskva: Nauka, 1973. 284 s.
16. Matveeva R. N., Butorova O. F., Bratilova N. P. Poleznye svojstva i metody razmnozheniya kedra sibirskogo. Krasnoyarsk: SibGTU, 2003. 154 s.
17. Matveeva R. N., Butorova O. F., Pastuhova A. M. Rost i semenoshenie kedrovyh sosen na plantacii “Izvestkovaya” v zelenoj zone g. Krasnoyarska. Krasnoyarsk : SibGTU, 2014. 168 s.
18. Matveeva R. N., Martynov V. S. Endogennaya izmenchivost' pokazatelej sosny kedrovoj sibirskoj // Plodovodstvo, semenovodstvo, introdukciya drevesnyh rastenij. Krasnoyarsk : SibGU, 2015. S. 46–49.
19. Nekrasova T. P. Stroenie kornevoj sistemy kedra sibirskogo, ee znachenie dlya povysheniya urozhaya semyan // Vozobnovlenie i uluchshenie lesov. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1964. Vyp. 8. S. 156–158.
20. Nekrasova T. P. Priposelkovye kedrovniki kak potencial'naya baza semenovodstva kedra sibirskogo // Effektivnost' ispol'zovaniya lesnyh resursov i ih vosstanovleniya v Zapadnoj Sibiri. Novosibirsk, 1971. S. 248–255.
21. Sitdikov R. G. Rost kul'tur sosny kedrovoj sibirskoj na Yuzhnom Urale // Plodovodstvo, semenovodstvo, introdukciya drevesnyh rastenij. Krasnoyarsk : SibGTU, 2005. S. 114–117.
22. Titov E. V. Car' sibirskoj tajgi. Moskva: Kolos, 2007. 152 s.
23. Tihonova I. V. Morfostruktura stvola i krony nizkoroslyh derev'ev Pinus sylvestris L. v usloviyah nedostatochnogo uvlazhneniya // Hvojnye boreal'noj zony. 2012. T. XXХ, № 1–2. S. 174–179.
24. Usol'cev V. A., Shcherba N. P. Struktura fitomassy kedrovyh sosen v plantacionnyh kul'turah. Krasnoyarsk : SibGTU, 1998. 134 s.
25. Chemyakina S. D. Vliyanie lesa na biosferu i rekreacionnoe ispol'zovanie lesnyh nasazhdenij. Moskva, 1978. 45 s.
26. Shcherba Yu. E. Burova A. V., Martynova D. O. Izmenchivost' biometricheskih pokazatelej 39-letnego klonovogo potomstva plyusovyh derev'ev kedra sibirskogo na gibridno-semennoj plantacii // Plodovodstvo, semenovodstvo, introdukciya drevesnyh rastenij. Krasnoyarsk : SibGU, 2021. S. 212–215.
27. Boratynska K., Bobowicz M. A. Variability of Pinus uncinata Ramond ex DC. as expressed in needle traits // Dendrobiology. 2000. Vol. 45. Pp. 7–16 : http://www.idpan.poznan.pl/images/stories/dendrobiology/vol145/45716.
28. Kloseiko J., Tilk M. Drought tolerance of Scots pine in diverse growth conditions on a dune estimated on the basis of cardohydrates and chlorophyll fluorescence in needles // Forestry Studies. 2008. Vol. 49. Pp. 25–36.
29. Titov E. V. Bioecological aspects of plantation nut cultivation of Siberian cedar (Pinus sibirica Du Tour.) in Russia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, International scientific and practical conference “Forest ecosystems as global resource of the biosphere: calls, threats, solutions” 23–24 October 2019, Voronezh, Russia, 392, 012069. URL: https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/392/1/012069/pdf. Doi:10.1088/1755-1315/392/1/012069.
Review
For citations:
Matveeva R.N., Butorova O.F., Shcherba Yu.E., Dyrdin S.N., Komarov I.V., Korostelev A.S. Variability of 17-year-old model trees indicators of siberian cedar pine. Conifers of the boreal area. 2023;41(2):145-150. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.53374/1993-0135-2023-2-145-150
Views:
10
Email this article 