Assessment of the preservation and condition of pinus sibirica du tour in provenance trials of Leningrad region
Abstract
Presents the results of the dynamics assessment of preservation and growth, and results of the analysis of phytopathological state of provenance trials of Pinus sibirica Du Tour created in the Leningrad region. By the age of 35, only 180 cedar pine trees remained, which largely depends on the care lack. However, it has been established that the progenies originated from the most remote regions to the north and east, and those poorly supplied by heat and moisture had lower preservation and growth rate. The progeny of the Buryat-Bichur origin had the highest preservation (6.4 %). The Yakut-Lena progeny is the most lagging in terms of preservation and growth. According to the complex of parameters, the Krasnoyarsk-Mansi and Kemerovo-Tashtagolsky progenies were among the best, in which there are healthy cedars with a height up to 15 m. The diseases locus (shoot cancer caused by Scleroderris lagerbergii Gremm., and blister cancer caused by Cronartium ribicola Dietr.) were detected. The state of provenance trials as a whole was estimated as strongly weakened. On average, the share of shrinking cedar accounts for 43%. The progenies originating from the eastern most areas were in the worst condition. Taking into account the results of long-term research, the successful cultivation of Siberian cedar pine is possible using seeds harvested south of 59°N and west of 99°E, that is originating from the Kemerovo, Tomsk, Irkutsk regions, and the Krasnoyarsk territory.
The work is aimed at clarifying the forest-seeding zoning of Pinus sibirica Du Tour in the Leningrad region.
About the Authors
M. A. Nikolaeva
Saint-Petersburg State Forest Technical University named after S. M. Kirov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
5, Institutsky per., Saint-Petersburg, 194021
E. Yu. Varentsova
Saint-Petersburg State Forest Technical University named after S. M. Kirov
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
5, Institutsky per., Saint-Petersburg, 194021
K. M. Mezhina
N. I. Vavilov All-Russian Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
42, 44, Bolshaya Morskaya Street, Saint-Petersburg 190000
References
1. Beh I. A., Taran I. V. Siberian miracle tree. Novosibirsk: Science, Sib. Branch, 1979. 126 p.
2. Bryntsev V. A., Kozhenkova A. A. Geograhpic variation of Siberian stone pine (Рinus sibiriсa du Tour) at the introduction // Russian Forestry Journal, 2016, no. 6. Pp. 89–97.
3. Vorontsov A. I., Mozolevskaya E. G., Sokolova E. S. Forest protection technology. M.: Ecology, 1991. 304 p.
4. Girgidov D. Ya. Experience in forest cultures Siberian stone pine in the Leningrad region // Siberian stone pine in the European North of the USSR: its distribution, regeneration and culture. Leningrad: Science, 1972. Pp. 31–40.
5. Grodnitskaya I. D., Kuznetsova G. V. Sustainability to fungal diseases of cedar pines (Pinus sibirica Du Tour and Pinus koraiensis Siebold et Zucc.) in provenance trials in the south Krasnoyarsk Krai // Siberian Journal of Forest Science. 2014. № 3. Pp. 164–171.
6. Ignatenko M. M. Siberian stone pine (biology, introduction, plantation). M.: Science. 1988. 159 p.
7. The study of available and creation of new provenance trials: Program and metods of work / Edited by Ye. P. Prokazin / Moscow: VNIILM, Pushkino, Russia, 1972. 52 p.
8. Iroshnikov A. I. Siberian stone pine. Provenance trials. M.: VDNH USSR, 1983. 3 p.
9. Iroshnikov A. I., Tvelenev M. V. Study of the gene pool, introduction and selection of cedar pines // Russian Journal of Forest Science (Lesovedenie), 2001. № 4. Pp. 62–68.
10. Krutov V. I., Minkevich I. I. Fungal diseases of tree species: Training manual. Petrozavodsk, 2002. 196 p.
11. Kuznetsova G.. V. Study of variability in climatypes of the Siberian stone pine (Pinus sibirica Du Tour) in the south of the Krasnoyarsk Krai // Coniferous boreal zone. 2007. Vol. XXIV. № 4-5. Pp. 423–426.
12. Kuznetsova G.. V., Grek V. S. Adaptation of cedar pines Pinus sibirica Du Tour and Pinus koraiensis Siebold et Zucc. to various environmental factors in the places of their testing // Siberian Journal of Forest Science. 2016. No 5. Pp. 63–71.
13. Forest-seeded zoning of the main forest-forming species in the USSR. M.: Timber industry, 1982. 368 p.
14. Mezhina K. M., Varentsova E. Yu., Nikolaeva М. А. Phytopatological status and growth character of Pinus sibirica Du Tour in provenance trials of the Gatchiny Forest District // Materials of the Youth Intern. scientificpractical Conf. (Nov. 29-30, 2017). Saint-Petersburg. SPb.: Polytechnic University, 2017. Pp. 136–141.
15. Merzlenko M. D. // History of forest seeding in Russia // Scientific works of MGUL. M.: MGUL, 1999. Vol. 297. Pp. 135–140.
16. Nikolaeva M. A. Prospects for the introduction of Siberian stone pine to the north-west of Russia // Modern problems of introduction and conservation of plant biodiversity: Materials 2nd Inter. Sc. Conf., dedicated to the 75th anniversary of the Botan. Garden and the 100th anniversary of the birth of Prof. S. I. Mashkin (Oct. 3–5, 2012). Voronezh: Wind Rose, 2012. Pp. 134–138.
17. Order of the Federal Forestry Service № 88 от 16.04.99 г. «On the inventory of provenance trials» (not active with 01.01.2021).
18. Prozherina N. A., Nakvasina E. N. Climate change and its impact on adaptation and intraspecific variability of conifer species of the European North of Russia // Russian Forestry Journal, 2022, no. 2, Pp. 9–25.
19. Talantsev N. Cedar. Moscow: Timber industry, 1981. 96 p.
20. Tvelenev M. V., Ushakov Ya. D., Elinetskiy L. M. et al. Instruction on cultivation of Siberian stone pine in the European part of the RSFSR. Moscow: Minleskhoz RSFSR, 1971. 44 p.
21. Filippova L. N., Uvarova N. I., Marisaya G. K. Use of the geographical variability of conifers in the North-West of the RSFSR. Manuscript. 1983.
22. Chabounine D. A., Pelevina N. N., Nikolaeva M. A. The stability of the forests of north-west regions of Russia under conditions of global climate warming // Accessment, Conservation and Sustainable Use of Forest Biodiversity. CBD Technical Series no. 3. Montreal, SCBD, 2001. Рp. 60–61.
23. Persson T., Andersson B. Genetic variance and covariance patterns of growth and survival in northern Pinus sylvestris // Scand. Journal Forest Res. 2003. V. 18. Pp. 332–343.
Review
For citations:
Nikolaeva M.A., Varentsova E.Yu., Mezhina K.M. Assessment of the preservation and condition of pinus sibirica du tour in provenance trials of Leningrad region. Conifers of the boreal area. 2022;40(5):381-387. (In Russ.)
Views:
5
Email this article 